Activist discourse and its influence on social change

Download article
Article

Activist discourse and its influence on social change

Iryna Ivanova, Solomiya Onufriv

Received 20.06.2025, Revised 05.11.2025, Accepted 16.12.2025

https://doi.org/10.67524/verus6/1.2025.15

Retrieved from Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025

Pages 15-28

Abstract

The study aimed to determine how discursive formulas, visual codes, and networked practices structured protest movements and contributed to social change across three national contexts: the United States, Brazil, and Turkey. The research was conducted on the basis of open sources, archival media materials, images and videos, as well as corpora of social media publications. Sequential stages included a historical-comparative review of the concept of activism, discursive analysis of slogans, content analysis of visual objects, and a comparison of media representations, followed by an assessment of social outcomes. The principal findings indicated that short, rhythmic formulas in the United States and Brazil functioned as markers of collective identity and as interpretive frames, consolidating meanings around demands for justice, bodily autonomy, and institutional accountability. Visual elements – such as the raised fist and contrasting black, white, and yellow compositions in American cities, as well as pink-violet palettes and memes in the Brazilian social media segment – served as low-threshold carriers of meaning and enabled rapid replication in both offline and online environments. In Turkey, the combination of slogans, ironic cartoons, and graffiti created an alternative informational ecosystem. Analysis of news formats demonstrated a systematic divergence between fast-paced television reporting and analytical newspaper coverage: the former tended to emphasise conflictual episodes, whereas the latter concentrated on structural causes and legal consequences. The social effects included the intensification of political debates on law-enforcement practices in the United States, the activation of women’s networks and the incorporation of equality issues into party platforms in Brazil, as well as the emergence of new civic initiatives and a rise in political awareness among young people in Turkey. The practical value of the study lies in the applicability of the proposed analytical framework for planning communications of civic initiatives, assessing media strategies, and developing an evidence base for public policy

References
  1. Acar, Y.G., & Uluğ, Ö.M. (2025). Ten years after the Gezi Park protests: Looking back on their legacy and impact. Social Movement Studies, 24(1), 130-135. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2023.2267996.
  2. Altay, C. (2013). Here we are: The imagination of public space in Gezi Park. Retrieved from https://creativetimereports.org/2013/06/14/here-we-are-the-imagination-of-public-space-in-gezi-park/.
  3. Barbera, P., & Metzger, M. (2013). A breakout role for Twitter? The role of social media in the Turkish protests. Retrieved from https://csmapnyu.org/assets/publications/2013_02_Turkish_Protests.pdf.
  4. Barter, C., & Koulu, S. (2021). Digital technologies and gender-based violence-mechanisms for oppression, activism and recovery. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(3), 367-375. doi: 10.1332/239868021X16315286472556.
  5. Bestvater, S., Gelles-Watnick, R., Odabaş, M., Anderson, M., & Smith, A. (2023). Ten years of #BlackLivesMatter on Twitter. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/06/29/ten-years-of-blacklivesmatter-on-twitter.
  6. Bill of the United States Congress No. H.R.7120 “George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020”. (2020, June). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7120?s=1&r=2&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22hr+7120%22%7D.
  7. Bosphorus Jazz Choir at Gezi Park! (2013). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPx8S0xDhTY.
  8. Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2022). Framing the Black Lives Matter movement: An analysis of shifting news coverage in 2014 and 2020. Social Currents, 9(6), 558-572. doi: 10.1177/23294965221092731.
  9. Carvalho, I. (2025). Digital media and feminist activism: Reclaiming inclusive urban spaces in the post-digital era. Cidades. Comunidades e Territórios, 49.
  10. Chandler, S.F. (2020). Making the march on Washington, August 28, 1963. Retrieved from https://jfk.blogs.archives.gov/2020/08/27/making-the-march-on-washington.
  11. Cook, J.A. (2023). ‘It was just the club from nowhere:’ The Montgomery bus boycott, the gastro-politics of black domestic women, and liberation theology futures. Religions, 14(6), article number 755. doi: 10.3390/rel14060755.
  12. Corrrias, L.D.A. (2023). “No justice, no peace”: Black lives matter, institutional racism, and legal order. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 55(1), 94-110. doi: 10.1080/00071773.2023.2240376.
  13. Cortés-Ramos, A., Torrecilla García, J.A., Landa-Blanco, M., Poleo Gutiérrez, F.J., & Castilla Mesa, M.T. (2021). Activism and social media: Youth participation and communication. Sustainability, 13(18), article number 10485. doi: 10.3390/su131810485.
  14. Cox, J.B. (2022). Black lives matter to media (finally): A content analysis of news coverage during summer 2020. Newspaper Research Journal, 43(2), 155-175. doi: 10.1177/07395329221092719.
  15. Doganay, Ü., & Kara, İ. (2025). Mediating protest: Gezi resistance and the evolving ecology of video activism in Turkey. Journalism and Media, 6(3), article number 95. doi: 10.3390/journalmedia6030095.
  16. Dunivin, Z.O., Yan, H.Y., Ince, J., & Rojas, F. (2022). Black Lives Matter protests shift public discourse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), article number e2117320119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117320119.
  17. Eilert, M., & Nappier Cherup, A. (2020). The activist company: Examining a company’s pursuit of societal change through corporate activism using an institutional theoretical lens. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 461-476. doi: 10.1177/0743915620947408.
  18. Facebook. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/.
  19. Fagundes-Ausani, M. (2025). Combating anti-feminism and building strategies for gender equality: The world of digital feminist media activism in Brazil and France. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 33-62. doi: 10.22151/politikon.12025.2.
  20. Farro, A.L., & Demirhisar, D.G. (2014). The Gezi Park movement: A Turkish experience of the twenty-first-century collective movements. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 176-189. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2014.894338.
  21. Feminista. (2025). Retrieved from https://pt.memedroid.com/memes/tag/feminista?page=1.
  22. Folha de S.Paulo. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.folha.uol.com.br/.
  23. Francis, M.M., & Wright-Rigueur, L. (2021). Black lives matter in historical perspective. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 441-458. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-122120-100052.
  24. Gold, T., & Peña, A.M. (2021). The rise of the contentious right: Digitally intermediated linkage strategies in Argentina and Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 63(3), 93-118. doi: 10.1017/lap.2021.23.
  25. Gruber, C. (2017). The Gezi Martyrs and visual resistance in Turkey (Part 1) “they are among us”. Retrieved from https://mizanproject.org/the-gezi-martyrs-and-visual-resistance-in-turkey-part-1/.
  26. Hogan, B., Cholbi, М., Madva, А., & Schertz Yost, В. (Eds.). (2021). The movement for black lives: Philosophical perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197507773.001.0001.
  27. Imran, M.M., & Raza, N.U.A. (2023). Discourse and social media activism: Investigating the role of online discourse in promoting social change. Global Language Review, 8(2), 337-355. doi: 10.31703/glr.2023(VIII-II).28.
  28. Instagram. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/.
  29. Jackson, C. (2020). Photos: Oakland’s Black Lives Matter murals call for justice. Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/arts/13881529/photos-black-lives-matter-murals-call-for-justice-on-oaklands-walls.
  30. Johnston, M. (n.d.). Seneca Falls Convention. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Seneca-Falls-Convention.
  31. Jolly, S., Cooper, J.N., & Kluch, Y. (2021). Allyship as activism: Advancing social change in global sport through transformational allyship. European Journal for Sport and Society, 18(3), 229-245. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2021.1941615.
  32. Kirişci, K. (2013). Turkey protests: Are the youth at Gezi Park a new actor in Turkish democracy? Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/turkey-protests-are-the-youth-at-gezi-park-a-new-actor-in-turkish-democracy.
  33. Kirk, T. (2024). Digital activism. In D. Green (Ed.), How change happens (рр. 183-203). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198899952.003.0013.
  34. Klein, C., Reimann, R., Quintana, I.O., Cheong, M., Ferreira, M., & Alfano, M. (2022). Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, article number 367. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01384-1.
  35. Li, Y., Bernard, J.-G., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2021). Beyond clicktivism: What makes digitally native activism effective? An exploration of the sleeping giants movement. Social Media + Society, 7(3). doi: 10.1177/20563051211035357.
  36. Loureiro, G. (2023). Hashtag feminism in Brazil: Making sense of gender-based violence with #PrimeiroAssédio. In K. Boyle & S. Berridge (Eds.), The Routledge companion to gender, media and violence (pp. 501-510). London: Routledge.
  37. Lovan, D. (2020). Breonna Taylor case: Louisville to pay $12M in settlement, reform police department. Retrieved from https://abc13.com/post/louisville-to-pay-$12m-to-breonna-taylors-mom-in-settlement/6423703.
  38. Madison, N., & Klang, M. (2020). The case for digital activism: Refuting the fallacies of slacktivism. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(2), 28-47. doi: 10.33621/jdsr.v2i2.25.
  39. Maison, L.M. (2022). Beyond western and indigenous perspectives on sustainability: Politicizing sustainability with the Zapatista Rebellious education. Journal of Transformative Education, 21(1), 41-58. doi: 10.1177/15413446221079595.
  40. Marcha das Margaridas. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.marchadasmargaridas.org.br/.
  41. Milkis, S., & Rader, K. (2024). The march on Washington Movement, the fair employment practices committee, and the long quest for racial justice. Studies in American Political Development, 38(1), 16-35. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X23000044.
  42. Mulheres Unidas Contra Bolsonaro. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/mulheresunidascontrabolsonaro/.
  43. Nacher, A. (2020). #BlackProtest from the web to the streets and back: Feminist digital activism in Poland and narrative potential of the hashtag. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 28(2), 260-273. doi: 10.1177/1350506820976900.
  44. Nyiramukama, D.K. (2024). The evolution of activism: From civil rights to digital advocacy. Newport International Journal of Current Issues in Arts and Management, 5(3), 18-21. doi: 10.59298/NIJCIAM/2024/5.3.18210.
  45. Occupy Gezi Images: Penguins Galore. (2013). Retrieved from https://christianejgruber.blogspot.com/2013/07/occupy-gezi-images-penguins-galore.html.
  46. Osava, M. (2024). New attempts to reduce gender inequality in Brazil. Retrieved from https://www.globalissues.org/news/2024/03/06/36176.
  47. Oz, M. (2016). Mainstream media’s coverage of the Gezi protests and protesters’ perception of mainstream media. Global Media and Communication, 12(2), 177-192. doi: 10.1177/1742766516653164.
  48. Ozturkcan, S., Kasap, N., Cevik, M., & Zaman, T. (2017). An analysis of the Gezi Park social movement tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(4), 426-440. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-03-2017-0064.
  49. Pain, P. (2020). “It took me quite a long time to develop a voice”: Examining feminist digital activism in the Indian #MeToo movement. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3139-3155. doi: 10.1177/1461444820944846.
  50. Palmer, M. (2021). Black Lives Matter in the national media: Disparities in coverage between legacy newsrooms and digital-first outlets. Minnesota Undergraduate Research & Academic Journal, 4(4).
  51. Piatak, J., & Mikkelsen, I. (2021). Does social media engagement translate to civic engagement offline? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(5), 1079-1101. doi: 10.1177/0899764021999444.
  52. Price, І. (2025). Were anti-war protesters successful in ending the war in Vietnam? Webster Review of International History, 5(1).
  53. Ray, R. (2022). Black lives matter at 10 years: 8 ways the movement has been highly effective. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/black-lives-matter-at-10-years-what-impact-has-it-had-on-policing.
  54. Sabral, J., & Erdim, Z. (2013). Will Istanbul’s protesters have the last laugh? Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22823730.
  55. Sainz, G.M., & Hanna, A. (2023). Youth digital activism, social media and human rights education: The Fridays for Future movement. Human Rights Education Review, 6(1), 116-136. doi: 10.7577/hrer.4958.
  56. Schlogl, L. (2022). Digital activism and the global middle class: Generation hashtag. London: Routledge.
  57. Schulte, M., Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Rollin, P. (2020). Social identity as a key concept for connecting transformative societal change with individual environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, article number 101525. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101525.
  58. Sorce, G., & Dumitrica, D. (2022). Transnational dimensions in digital activism and protest. Review of Communication, 22(3), 157-174. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2107877.
  59. Special collections research center: Activism and social reform. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://library.syracuse.edu/special-collections-research-center/collections/collection-areas/activism-and-social-reform.
  60. Strong, K., Walker, S., Wallace, D., Sriprakash, A., Tikly, L., & Soudien, C. (2023). Learning from the movement for black lives: Horizons of racial justice for comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 1-24. doi: 10.1086/722487.
  61. Taştan, C. (2013). The Gezi Park protests in Turkey: A qualitative field research. Insight Turkey Summer, 15(3), 27-38.
  62. The new Gezi Park protesters: Istanbul’s gentrification wars. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll2RiAVLnVg.
  63. This is life after Gezi Park protests in Turkey. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUYykmxgITA.
  64. Treré, E., & Kaun, A. (2021). Digital media activism: A situated, historical, and ecological approach beyond the technological sublime. In G. Balbi, N. Ribeiro, V. Schafer & C. Schwarzenegger (Eds.), Digital roots: Historicizing media and communication concepts of the digital age (pp. 193-208). Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. doi: 10.1515/9783110740202-011.
  65. Turkish prosecutors request TV broadcasts during Gezi protests to determine ‘propaganda’. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.duvarenglish.com/turkish-prosecutors-request-tv-broadcasts-during-gezi-protests-to-determine-propaganda-news-65621.
  66. Uzun, B. (2019). Youth politics in contemporary Turkey: Political hegemony, hybrid incorporation, and youth (De-) mobilization (2010-2016). Youth Politics in the Middle East and North Africa, 7-13.
  67. Vachhani, S.J. (2024). Networked feminism in a digital age – mobilizing vulnerability and reconfiguring feminist politics in digital activism. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3), 1031-1048. doi: 10.1111/gwao.13097.
  68. Wang, Y., & Tavmen, G. (2025). New outlets of digital feminist activism in China: The #SeeFemaleWorkers campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 25(4), 984-1000. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2024.2334782.
  69. Young, R.J.C. (2020). May 1968: Anticolonial revolution for a decolonial future. Interventions, 23(3), 432-447. doi: 10.1080/1369801X.2020.1843517.
  70. Zur, H., & Hatuka, T. (2023). Local-digital activism: Place, social media, body, and violence in changing urban politics. Social Media + Society, 9(2). doi: 10.1177/20563051231166443.
  71. Х (Twitter). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://x.com/.
Suggested citation
Ivanova, I., & Onufriv, S. (2025). Activist discourse and its influence on social change. Journal of Discourse Analysis & Critical Studies, 1(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.67524/verus6/1.2025.15